Safe as houses? The return of real estate

If you were to summarise what was going on  in the commercial property market in one  word, you could do worse than to alight on  ‘renaissance’. At least as far as the pensions  industry is concerned.

Features

Web Share

If you were to summarise what was going on  in the commercial property market in one  word, you could do worse than to alight on  ‘renaissance’. At least as far as the pensions  industry is concerned.

“The rental sector is rising more quickly  than owner-occupied. Some of this is due to  affordability, and lack of supply, but also the  desire for mobility,” he says.  Young, professional classes want greater  flexibility and are willing to forego the purchase  of a home for short-term leases. Though their demand for property is appealing,  “the execution is challenging,” adds  Patel.

Alex Greaves, fund manager, residential at  M&G Real Estate doesn’t necessarily agree.  The PRS now houses four million households,  a figure that has doubled over the last  decade. Most of these households live in  accommodation  provided by small scale  individual  landlords, buy to let or even overseas  investors.  So what’s stopping the growth? Seemingly  not very much.

The timing seems to be perfect,  as pension funds search for income.  The UK is 30 years behind Europe and other  markets in terms of residential house building,  so there should be an excess of demand.  The performance of residential has also been  strong.  At the end of 2013, the IPD UK Annual  Property  Index showed residential had outperformed  all other sectors and over time,  but a lack of supply of the right kind of stock  is preventing the institutional market from  developing, says Greaves.

“This is all about commercialising the rental  sector, which was done with student accommodation  about 15 years ago. We have to  build for purpose, deliver high quality services,  robust processes and cover all markets,  from Aldi all the way up to Waitrose in terms  of stock.”

Private, not social

The discussion of expanding residential  focuses  on the PRS, not social housing.  Though some asset managers operate in that  sector, there is division between what is considered  real estate and infrastructure that  some don’t want to cross. Social housing has  its own potential problems, in terms of  regulation.

“Intervention by government means rent  controls are feared because we want rents to  be market-led,” says Patel. “If the government  waded in with rent controls, institutions  will come out of the market again.”

Though the Labour Party in opposition has  warned it will control utility prices if and  when it comes to power, few believe any  future  government would intervene in the  PRS these days, as the trend, particularly  across Europe, has been to deregulate.  The core residential market is essentially  professional groups aged between 25-34 as  they want to live near to town and don’t have  to concern themselves with schools, off-road  parking or golf clubs. They also have the  highest wage growth and flexibility.

Like commercial property, the pressures of  location have forced investors to consider  various alternatives. In London, that means  “nowhere there’s a Boris bike, because it’s  too central,” says Greaves. “This means zone  three and beyond.”  Manchester, Birmingham and Leeds have  seen low levels of rental growth and lag the  capital for capital value growth, but the areas  serviced by HS2 and Crossrail offer excellent  targets, Greaves says.

None of these developments take into  account  the potential for government-backed  stimulus packages, such as Funding for  Lending or Help to Buy. This is in part due to  the fact that investors want long-term income  streams and so a single sale is development,  not investment and few see how such  projects  might kickstart the ‘institutionalisation‘  of residential property.

However, changes to permitted development  rights (PDR) must offer an opportunity for  investors to access properties no longer fit  for business purpose in secondary or tertiary  business districts. Sanderson at Hermes is  unconvinced.  “While there are a lot of creative developers  out there, it’s not a panacea. You need to sell  units, not rent to workers and the economics  only work if you sell at £1000 a square foot,”  he says.  “And the challenge will be if a building didn’t  work as a commercial property, it is not clear  as to why it should work as a residential  property.”

But Ben Habib, chief executive at First  Property  Group, rejects that view and is  using  PDR to develop a residential portfolio.  “Technology has already transformed the  way we consume with massive structural  and irreversible  impact upon retail property  portfolios. This makes perfectly viable properties  available for conversion to residential,”  says Habib.  That said, some authorities, such as  Richmond  and Islington, are making it difficult  for developers by using ‘article four  exclusion’,  which means PDR does not apply  and any developer has to go through the  normal  planning process, much to Habib’s  annoyance.

Comments

More Articles

Subscribe

Subscribe to Our Newsletter and Magazine

Sign up to the portfolio institutional newsletter to receive a weekly update with our latest features, interviews, ESG content, opinion, roundtables and event invites. Institutional investors also qualify for a free-of-charge magazine subscription.

×