Biodiversity’s threat to economic growth


25 Apr 2022

The world’s converging crises in climate, nature, the economy and public health must be tackled together, but we are far behind where we need to be, argues Laurent Babikian.



Web Share

The world’s converging crises in climate, nature, the economy and public health must be tackled together, but we are far behind where we need to be, argues Laurent Babikian.

Climate change is already happening and is to some degree unstoppable. 2020 was the hottest year on record, and by mid-2021 devastating floods and record-breaking temperatures hit Europe and other parts of the world.

The World Health Organisation estimates that climatic changes already cause more than 150,000 additional deaths annually, linked to extreme weather, natural disasters and malnutrition.

We know that to prevent catastrophic and irreversible climate change, we must limit warming to no more than 1.5-degrees above pre-industrial levels.

This will entail policymakers, corporates and capital markets working together to halve global greenhouse gas emissions and eliminate deforestation by 2030 to achieve net zero by 2050.

However, according to the IPCC, global average temperatures have already increased by 1.1-degrees, and the world is on track for more than 2-degrees warming.

Nature crisis

These effects are intimately tied to and reinforce a similar crisis in nature.

Global wildlife populations have dropped by 68% since 1970, according to the World Wildlife Fund. 75% of the Earth’s ice-free land surface has already been significantly altered, most oceans are polluted, and more than 85% of wetlands have been lost.

Biodiversity loss, caused by deforestation, intensive agriculture and mismanaged urban growth, created the conditions for the Covid-19 pandemic, and triggered dire warnings of more to come.

Half of global GDP depends on our natural world and environmental risks also have a significant impact on global capital markets.

An increasingly concentrated group of banks, investors and insurers ultimately own the assets of the companies exposed to the nature crisis through their shareholdings and loans.

A fifth of the $100trn (£76trn) of assets under management in 2020 was managed by the top four funds (BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity) with 40% managed by the top 20.

This market dynamic has seen the mainstreaming of ESG in financial institutions. 2021 was a record-breaking year for investment flows into ESG funds and issuances of green and sustainability-linked debt, with $649bn (£493.2bn) invested in ESG funds, up from $542bn (£412bn) in 2020.

The Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) is now widely supported by financial institutions and mandatory TCFD-aligned disclosure is on the horizon in many markets with multiple jurisdictions announcing roadmaps to enforcement.

However, while ESG is widely embraced, action to address the nature crises lags behind other issues such as climate change – in terms of how well they are understood and integrated into investment processes.

Slow progress

In 2020, CDP released its reporting and accountability framework for the financial sector, requesting 695 publicly-listed financial institutions to disclose their environmental data.

CDP’s analysis of this data, published in The Time to Green Finance, showed that while more than 80% of the 332 responding financial institutions assessed at least one of their portfolios (lending, investment, insurance underwriting) for exposure to climate risks, this figure dropped to around 60% for risks related to water security.

With 70% of financial institutions engaged either not responding or indicating that they do not assess water risks for any portfolio, it is clear that the sector is failing to pay sufficient attention to water security.

CDP’s recent analysis of European financial institutions found that progress is similarly slow on other nature-related issues, with investors being nearly twice as likely to assess their portfolios for climate risks than for forests (88% vs 46%).

This is worrying given that water, forests and nature-related issues are largely non-diversifiable, in a similar way to climate change. The sectors and industries that account for the most water use and pollution, such as food and beverage, materials and energy, are key to the functioning of our economy.

Holistic approach

Universal investors like insurance companies and pension funds cannot construct portfolios that span the economy without exposure to those key sectors. Nor can investors diversify away nature-related risks by investing across geographies.

Work is underway to expand our reporting and accountability framework to cover all planetary boundaries. Over the next five years, we will cover a wider, more holistic approach to disclosing, analysing and improving environmental performance.

Our accountability mechanism will also enable the tracking of progress and credibility of commitments made against initiatives, such as the Taskforce for Nature-related Financial Disclosure and the Science-Based Targets Network.

Currently, just 5% of companies disclosing to CDP have a science-based emissions reduction target, a target for reducing water withdrawals, and a best-practice forests commitment including zero-de- forestation. This is not good enough.

The world’s converging crises in climate, nature, the economy and public health must be tackled together but we are far behind where we need to be. We must act now to prevent more deaths, more disruption and more irreversible change.

Laurent Babikian is joint global director of capital markets at CDP, an environmental impact data specialist.


More Articles


Subscribe to Our Newsletter and Magazine

Sign up to the portfolio institutional newsletter to receive a weekly update with our latest features, interviews, ESG content, opinion, roundtables and event invites. Institutional investors also qualify for a free-of-charge magazine subscription.