We use cookies to support features like login and allow trusted media partners to analyse aggregated site usage.
To dismiss this message and allow cookies to be used, please click "Continue".

Continue

Opinion

Twitter board

Follow us
  • RT @BNPPAM_COM: 2017 was one of the most active hurricane seasons on record, causing up to USD 475 billion worth of damage. What are the in…2 days ago
  • RT @PensionsTony: At the Aon London #pensions conference. About to start my workshop on how well #DC schemes are meeting the needs of #memb…2 days ago
  • Andrew Wauchope talks to Mark Dunne about charities and their pension schemes, the secret of being a good trustee a… https://t.co/xcdcxs61QL2 days ago
  • Enter the Dragon : China’s inclusion in the @MSCI_Inc Emerging Market index has caused little excitement, but, as L… https://t.co/oy0EdSI6A84 days ago
  • The @InvescoUKinsti whitepaper: Responsible investing and active ownership. Invesco’s Bonnie Saynay and Henning St… https://t.co/E3Gdh9eDSM9 days ago
  • Charlotte Moore looks at the reaction of financial markets to Brexit has already changed the shape of the relations… https://t.co/6KH9jnWTtq9 days ago
  • RT @AonRetirementUK: Want to know more about the benefits of factor-based investing for your DB pension scheme? Aon’s next Investment Break…10 days ago
  • Learn more about why everyone is talking ESG on our new ESG HUB, where we will be publishing our latest features pl… https://t.co/Dg9FiwCPCn11 days ago
  • 2018: The year of the human?. Cyber crime, greater disclosure, fixed income, people and, of course, climate change.… https://t.co/HMkzWcrFNy11 days ago
  • ''Building a global portfolio of equities could also provide much needed diversification'', discover why in our Glo… https://t.co/y90GhLlmCD11 days ago
  • What is your stance on executive pay? is bigger really better? Read more in our new ESG feature:… https://t.co/cUXMiCDuE536 days ago
  • November Magazines Cover Story : Interest rates - The slow return to normality . What impact will this have on port… https://t.co/7RYFEXJMVL39 days ago
  • ''Alternative assets have been one of the winners of the banking crisis, which marks its tenth anniversary next yea… https://t.co/pbLbxU9tza39 days ago
  • Pension scheme buy-outs could top £30bn this year - @JLT_EB https://t.co/JhiPizcTnc #pensions52 days ago
  • @PensionsInfra to spend £400m on interests in 10 PPP infrastructure projects https://t.co/O2Lfmy16B6 #infrastructure #pensions87 days ago
  • FirstGroup consolidates £700m of pension assets within the LGPS to create £1bn fund - https://t.co/tOmO0W84h588 days ago
  • £10bn wiped off #FTSE350 DB schemes in October - @JLT_EB https://t.co/iTO0fE005i #pensions113 days ago
  • Capita Asset Services upgrades its UK dividend forecast for 2017 to a record £94bn - https://t.co/9rBSfa16fz #dividends122 days ago
  • Smiths Group shifts £207m of liabilities to Canada Life https://t.co/bJvq65vuB2 #pensions123 days ago
  • A special feature from our sponsor SYZ Asset Management – ‘Contrarian investing in the Italian banking crisis’ https://t.co/6tOeW272XB144 days ago

Friday View: July 12 2013

Climate change: Beliefs no longer matter

Climate change: Beliefs no longer matter

Emma Cusworth
Tuesday 23rd January 2018

Whether you believe in climate change or not, Emma Cusworth explains that investors can no longer ignore its impact on portfolios.

Does it matter anymore if you don’t buy the science behind climate change? Is it possible anymore to ignore climate change and still claim to be doing your fiduciary duty? There are plenty of investors who still do not integrate climate policies into their portfolios.

The trouble is, the world is already changing regardless of what individual investors believe or don’t believe. And that means certain risks and opportunities are coming down the pipeline at you whether you’re ready or not.

With every big climate conference that goes by, it becomes more and more clear the direction of global policy is already set when it comes to protecting the environment.

COP 21 in 2015, which resulted in the Paris Accord, marked a turning point in global policy. Since then, governments, states, cities, businesses and many investors have taken steps, or announced plans to, that are designed to increase transparency around carbon emissions and cut them.

In December 2017 – the second anniversary of COP 21 – there were a string of meaningful announcements made that will change the course of many companies in the coming years. The World Bank, for example, will no longer finance upstream fossil fuel projects from 2019. The same event saw California and Washington join Canada, Mexico, Costa Rica, Colombia and Chile in agreeing to use a carbon emissions price as a central economic policy.

Europe reached a similar point shortly before when member states came to a landmark agreement on the European Emissions Trading System that is expected to increase the price of carbon on the continent to the point where it becomes investment relevant.

President Macron’s Paris conference also saw the launch of Climate Action 100+, an investor initiative aimed at engaging with the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitters to improve governance on climate change, curb emissions and strengthen disclosure. The group includes Candriam Investors, the Church Commissioners for England, the Environment Agency Pension Fund and the BBC Pension Trust among its long and prestigious list of members.

On the same day the initiative was formally launched, Exxon announced it would begin publishing details about how climate change could affect its business.

What is really interesting about these developments is that they underline a structural and secular shift in global policy towards a low-carbon future. That is going to have an impact on how assets are valued. And that, in turn, has investors worried. Hence the need for initiatives like Climate Action 100+, who will continue to pressure the companies they own to change their policies.

Can any individual investor choose to ignore this? It’s increasingly difficult to see how they could defend such a stance as being within their fiduciary duty.

Consider, for example, the movement to phase out the internal combustion engine in the UK, France, India, Norway, China and the state of California. This has significant implications for the valuation of automakers over the next five, 10, 15 years. The share prices of companies that are not well prepared for the move will struggle to keep up.

The same will be true of their suppliers. Commodity allocations will also need to be adjusted to reflect, for example, the expected 300% increase in demand for lithium from the mid-2020s. Mines are not that easy to open. Metal prices will change meaningfully as this legislation starts to bite. And then there are all the service stations on every road in every one of those countries. It will take massive infrastructure spending to get enough charging points in place and to decommission the thousands of petrol pumps that will be displaced.

What this all means is risk. Real risk to financial returns. And massive opportunity of course, but it is the risk that really bites when it comes to fiduciary duty. Can a fiduciary really ignore the consequences of this secular shift in global policy when they are so clearly linked to financial performance? The question of whether environmental or governance considerations are part of fiduciary duty is now a mute point.

So it really doesn’t matter whether you believe the science or not anymore. So many people do now believe that the impact on portfolios will be profound whether you agree or not.

0

Leave your comment

View our comments policy

Please login or register with us to leave a comment. It's completely free!