We use cookies to support features like login and allow trusted media partners to analyse aggregated site usage.
To dismiss this message and allow cookies to be used, please click "Continue".

Continue

Opinion

Twitter board

Follow us
  • My week on Twitter 🎉: 2 Mentions, 3.3K Mention Reach, 5 Likes, 6 Retweets, 7.76K Retweet Reach. See yours with… https://t.co/IZfviidt4H16 hours ago
  • Friday View: Trustees feel the heat over climate change - bankers' pensions back in black - TPR suspends trustee -… https://t.co/kUKa8QUF9w3 days ago
  • Increased regulatory oversight will be risk-based, TPR keyperson will meet schemes deemed riskier several times a y… https://t.co/wUiKPGESaU5 days ago
  • Lesley Titcomb, TPR chief executive says change is on its way, the regulator will increase oversight between valuat… https://t.co/Wu8Pv6TfqS5 days ago
  • Join us and @AonRetirementUK on the 4th of July at the luxurious Victorian Bath House featuring educational presen… https://t.co/r1abr8Qls06 days ago
  • DWP wants trustees to feel the heat over climate change https://t.co/bs25DvyWGF #ESG #climatechange https://t.co/dZEXB0g8a46 days ago
  • My week on Twitter 🎉: 3 New Followers. See yours with https://t.co/mCw3VcMQGw https://t.co/3kEHNr3xyz7 days ago
  • Friday View: Heathrow's ÂŁ325 million buy-in - Auto enrolment for the gig economy - Brunel opts for ACS structure -… https://t.co/vsnML1Vzb510 days ago
  • Pimlico Plumbers- Could gig economy workers be auto enrolled? https://t.co/qgrlWxMUW8 #gigeconomy #autoenrolment… https://t.co/wnDH18iPxG10 days ago
  • RT @eVestment: Workers in the #UK are open to increasing their retirement savings and tend to place greater emphasis on workplace #pensions…11 days ago
  • The June issue of portfolio institutional is now out: Featuring our take on #carillion and lessons for trustees as… https://t.co/yC2PNgoaPr12 days ago
  • RT @PensionsSion: Aon's very own John Belgrove shares his views in this piece. Worth reading... https://t.co/VYEJWjAU3z12 days ago
  • My week on Twitter 🎉: 2 Mentions, 3.29K Mention Reach, 2 Retweets, 3.27K Retweet Reach. See yours with… https://t.co/MeoES7Ch3L14 days ago
  • Friday View: South Yorkshire hedges pension risk- Recruitment execs face prison over pension scam - Johnston Press… https://t.co/9fV8Z48WtF17 days ago
  • RT @cfjescott: A recent piece of mine on the @CMAgovUK investigation into investment consultants in @portfolio_inst #investment https://t.c…19 days ago
  • Our ESG Roundtable: Better Long-term outcomes? Available to download now https://t.co/o7T8kWSwWY https://t.co/oHs4VlRK9E21 days ago
  • Active vs Passive : In 2016 investors withdrew around $285bn from active funds and pumped almost $429bn into passiv… https://t.co/tjpxhTxW5Z21 days ago
  • RT @WhtstheDiehlio: .@AitkenRL spoke with @graniteshares CEO Will Rhind about the ongoing active vs. passive debate. Check out their though…21 days ago
  • Green is the new black. A record sum is expected to be raised under the green bond banner this year, but is it doom… https://t.co/JYP8k0ZfZk23 days ago
  • Our Cover Story! Property: Solid Returns - Low gilt yields are forcing schemes to pile into bricks and mortar. Mark… https://t.co/9nyjFp0Z4R23 days ago

Friday View: Management Macro uncertainty keep calm wait opportunity

Compliance: what the buy-side can learn from the sell-side

Compliance: what the buy-side can learn from the sell-side

By Bruno Piers de Raveschoot
Friday 9th December 2016

The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), which came into force in July this year and builds on the 2013 Directive, has strengthened the hand of the regulator.

What changes under MAR?

MAR now demands that buy-side firms carry out their own monitoring for market abuse. This was a burden that firms had previously managed to avoid, as their brokers could carry out this monitoring on their behalf. Likewise, the scope for both instruments and venues has also increased. The sheer quantity of data that firms now need to collect, monitor and report on significantly increases regulatory risk.

Not only this, but the buy-side now needs to be able to cope very quickly with the new regulation and its new monitoring and associated data needs. They also need to have systems in place to detect insider dealing and market manipulation on orders and trades before exchanges and, more importantly, before these same detections are picked up by the regulator or their broker.

Indeed, under MAR, brokers who detect manipulation or attempts of manipulation will report them to the regulator, without being able to inform the asset manager of their action.

As such, the buy-side is facing a compliance challenge unlike any it has faced before.

This challenge mirrors the journey that sell-side companies went on more than 10 years ago. By learning from the sell-side’s experience, the buy-side will be better able to stay on the right side of the regulator.

Lessons from the sell-side

The first lesson to take from the experience of the sell-side is that successful compliance requires the effective management of an exponentially greater volume of data to monitor but also data needed for the detection. This data is complex to obtain, especially when it comes to monitoring asset classes that are non listed or illiquid.  Buy-side firms must take a new approach to data monitoring and surveillance, investing in tools and solutions that are capable of working to the new regulatory requirements and the increased scale of responsibilities that this entails for compliance teams.

As part of this process, forward-thinking firms are not only looking at what tools are needed to meet current regulatory requirements, but thinking about how these tools can be future-proofed.

We explored this topic at recent RIMES Regulatory Seminar, held specifically to discuss the impacts of MAR.

At the Seminar we examined the effective use of lexicons as a surveillance e-communications tool used by the sell-side to monitor trades. Lexicons are libraries of the key words and phrases that may indicate suspicious behaviour. The experience of sell-side firms is that lexicons are not always dynamic and agile enough to capture the increasingly subtle and obfuscated language that traders use. The implication for the buy-side is that many sophisticated firms are reviewing lexicons more frequently in order to understand how the lingo and jargon is changing, and ensure their surveillance tools remain efficient and accurate as the months and years pass.

Another lesson compliance teams can take from the sell-side is how to address the challenge to achieving an overarching view of all MAR regulatory obligations in order to act quickly and confidently.

Some buy-side firms are creating central data repositories in-house to collate and analyse necessary data. However, the experience of the sell-side told us that this approach could prove inefficient and costly. Instead, asset managers can adopt market surveillance tools that read any file type without needing to reformat the data.

Many firms are also considering whether keeping compliance in-house is still an option.

By outsourcing these tasks, asset managers avoid much of the cost associated with the otherwise necessary overhaul of their IT. Moreover, with managed service providers, asset managers will be able to benefit from levels of expertise most will not have in their own organisation. However, it must be remembered that ultimate responsibility for compliance rests on the heads of the asset managers – not their managed service providers. It is therefore essential that any such partnerships are only made with signficant due diligence.

Compliance monitoring is now core

MAR represents a seismic shift in regulatory responsibility. These new compliance responsibilities are real, and affect every single member of a buy-side firm. Without the right cultural pressure and prioritisation in place, several months after MAR became law many firms are still struggling to allow time for proper analysis to correctly address the changes required. And, the truth of the matter is, they are now out of time. Key decision makers must see compliance training as essential and ensure that every member of their team understands the requirements and boundaries of the regulation.

As the sell-side did some 10 years ago, buy-side firms need to recognise that compliance monitoring is now a core part of their operational requirements. They must start thinking about how to change their business to reflect this fact. In part, this requires taking a fresh look at transaction and order monitoring systems capable of handling the increasing scope of instruments. This is a huge change and one that buy-side firms must act on immediately.

Bruno Piers de Raveschoot is COO of the regulatory division at RIMES

0

Leave your comment

View our comments policy

Please login or register with us to leave a comment. It's completely free!

Friday View

Friday View

How investor action helps cut CO2 emissions