We use cookies to support features like login and allow trusted media partners to analyse aggregated site usage.
To dismiss this message and allow cookies to be used, please click "Continue".



Twitter board

Follow us
  • "To get to the heart of some of the issues surrounding responsible investment we brought trustees, fund managers an… https://t.co/ujIdYI4gKI9 hours ago
  • RT @TimGiles90: @TimManuel17 on Trustee awareness of #climatechange ft in @portfolio_inst latest #aonexpertsinthenews https://t.co/WJdMA3MD…yesterday
  • Beyond bonds: How pension schemes are looking to update their LDI strategies https://t.co/qcq3fx3dJJ #ldi… https://t.co/Aj4PVgTz0G2 days ago
  • Friday View: Climate change: a hot topic - TPR prepares for master trust deadline - Prudential and Aviva's de-risk… https://t.co/c8N8HZ62HE6 days ago
  • As offices and workplaces are heating up, so is the debate on climate change: What are trustees doing to protect sa… https://t.co/U77fvAzS199 days ago
  • Friday View: Infrastructure: Land of opportunity  - FTSE 100 schemes are back in black - Brewery hit by TPR fine -… https://t.co/disYRfYaUw13 days ago
  • With 70% of pension schemes planning to allocate to infrastructure - the scramble for assets begins. Our latest cov… https://t.co/aWetZeBhq216 days ago
  • Exclusive: Border to Coast appoints new CIO https://t.co/mipd2Aeyvy #LGPS #pensions #LPGSpooling https://t.co/P0D1EQLvmu20 days ago
  • Friday View: PPF's Ian Scott - Border to Coast goes live - TPR launches master trust consultation - Railpen invests… https://t.co/mSeDHNrEjP20 days ago
  • Local authority pension pool Border to Coast goes live with two equity funds, hires new CIO: https://t.co/4uIWEpuD1C https://t.co/8UP3stSh9o20 days ago
  • Our interview with the PPF's Ian Scott is now live! “The uniqueness of what we do here at the PPF is sometimes over… https://t.co/On1pYg5aXJ22 days ago
  • Latest buy-in means @UK_CAA has de-risked £1.7bn of pension scheme liabilities - https://t.co/eFRK22wyI2 #pensions https://t.co/rrYgf0fQAr24 days ago
  • Friday View: Border to Coast launches UK equity tender - Rentokil Trustee faces fine - Gleeson directors banned - P… https://t.co/wx2SJ0bGfG34 days ago
  • Shareholder engagement: It’s good to talk For responsible investors talk isn’t cheap. Not only does research sugges… https://t.co/imwrezJuKJ34 days ago
  • Friday View: PA's DB scheme signs buy-out deal - PIC invests in Midlands housing association - Newton Video on Emer… https://t.co/GbWDdyENlN41 days ago
  • RT @minerva_ESG: Hey, all #ESG and#corpgov tweeps, lend a hand to @portfolio_inst important opportunity to support investors' understanding…41 days ago
  • We want to know your appetite and understanding for ESG! Please click the link to take our 5 minute survey to tell… https://t.co/SsVgQzEKIc42 days ago
  • RT @AonRetirementUK: Great event, thanks for hosting @portfolio_inst. Inspired location too! https://t.co/we7Ou46ns342 days ago
  • Full house at our Portfolio Prepared event, Oliver Hamilton Illiquids specialist @AonRetirementUK discusses conside… https://t.co/F0qPFPjUSP43 days ago
  • West Midlland Pension Fund’s Jill Davys: “I am reluctant to overpay for assets” Assistant director of investments a… https://t.co/YHtEIU5BSN45 days ago


Carillion bosses saw pensions as “waste of money” damning  report reveals

Carillion bosses saw pensions as “waste of money” damning report reveals

Mona Dohle
Wednesday 16th May 2018

Carillion executives systematically underfunded the firm’s pension scheme, while The Pension Regulator (TPR) failed to protect members, a damning parliamentary report on the construction giant's bankruptcy said today.

The inquiry, conducted by the Work and Pensions and BEIS select committees, highlights that as of 2013, Carillion had a combined DB deficit of £86m from and earlier scheme, which according to the report could have been considered manageable. However, the construction firm subsequently acquired a number of other firms with significantly higher deficits, which resulted in the total pension deficit at the December 2016 valuation to be estimated at £990m.

It  reveals that when Carillion entered liquidation in 2018, it had responsibility for funding 13 DB pension schemes, of which 11 will be referred to the Pension Protection Fund (PPF), leaving the lifeboat for pension savers with a £800m hit. This represents the largest ever claim on PPF resources.

The report also uncovers a history of conflict between Richard Adam, Carillion’s finance director, and the pension fund’s board of trustees, with both sides repeatedly disagreeing on the valuation of the pension deficit and need for additional funding.

Going back to 2011, the Carillion trustees calculated the firm’s deficit at £770m and requested annual recovery payments of £65m for 14 years to address it. Meanwhile, the firm claimed the deficit was at £620m and offered recovery contributions of £33.4m annually, claiming that it could not afford higher payments.

Gazelle Corporate Finance, an independent covenant provider for the trustees, stressed that those claims were contradicted by the firm’s high dividend payments and much more optimistic presentations to the City in a bid to attract investment. Gazelle concluded that Carillion should not have been paying such high dividends at the expense of funding its pension scheme.

The inquiry quotes trustee chair Robin Ellison who stated at the time that Carillion finance director Adam saw funding pension schemes as a “waste of money”. “The pension trustees were outgunned in negotiations with directors’ intent on paying as little as possible into the pension schemes. Largely powerless, they took a conciliatory approach with a sponsor who was their only hope of additional money and, for some of them, their own employer,” the inquiry states.

Meanwhile the firm’s  former directors were not members of the DB pension schemes in question but received generous employer contributions to a defined contribution scheme. For example, Richard Howson and Richard Adam received employer contributions of £231,000 and £163,000 respectively for their work in 2016, as the report reveals. Moreover, their performance indicators to determine bonus payments did not include their performance in reducing the pension deficit. leaving them with no incentives to do so.

The Carillion scandal raises questions of the role of TPR. The inquiry states that the regulator failed in its objectives to protect members, while the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) is expected to be hit with its biggest bill ever. It argues that the regulator should have imposed a contribution schedule on the employer, imposed a maximum term for recovery payments and intervened on the firm’s dividend payments.

Lesley Titcomb, chief executive of TPR, responds to these challenges: “We actively seek to learn lessons to better protect members of pension schemes. In the past the balance between members and employers was not always right. The report underlines the significant changes already made at TPR but there is more work to do so.”

During the announcement of its corporate plan last week, TPR pledged that it intends to spend more money on protecting pension members and cracking down on rogue employers, it also confirmed that it intends to make greater use of its regulatory powers.

However, Ian Browne, pensions expert at Old Mutual Wealth, argues that more could be done to enforce compliance: “Companies and their directors need to be terrified of the wrath of the TPR, something the committee feel is far from the case currently. Indeed in 13 years of DB scheme regulation, TPR has issued just three warning notices relating to its section 231 powers, and has not seen a single case through to imposing a schedule of contributions. So there is some merit to this criticism,” he says.


Leave your comment

View our comments policy

Please login or register with us to leave a comment. It's completely free!