We use cookies to support features like login and allow trusted media partners to analyse aggregated site usage.
To dismiss this message and allow cookies to be used, please click "Continue".

Continue

Twitter board

Follow us
  • RT @BNPPAM_COM: 2017 was one of the most active hurricane seasons on record, causing up to USD 475 billion worth of damage. What are the in…2 days ago
  • RT @PensionsTony: At the Aon London #pensions conference. About to start my workshop on how well #DC schemes are meeting the needs of #memb…2 days ago
  • Andrew Wauchope talks to Mark Dunne about charities and their pension schemes, the secret of being a good trustee a… https://t.co/xcdcxs61QL2 days ago
  • Enter the Dragon : China’s inclusion in the @MSCI_Inc Emerging Market index has caused little excitement, but, as L… https://t.co/oy0EdSI6A84 days ago
  • The @InvescoUKinsti whitepaper: Responsible investing and active ownership. Invesco’s Bonnie Saynay and Henning St… https://t.co/E3Gdh9eDSM9 days ago
  • Charlotte Moore looks at the reaction of financial markets to Brexit has already changed the shape of the relations… https://t.co/6KH9jnWTtq9 days ago
  • RT @AonRetirementUK: Want to know more about the benefits of factor-based investing for your DB pension scheme? Aon’s next Investment Break…10 days ago
  • Learn more about why everyone is talking ESG on our new ESG HUB, where we will be publishing our latest features pl… https://t.co/Dg9FiwCPCn11 days ago
  • 2018: The year of the human?. Cyber crime, greater disclosure, fixed income, people and, of course, climate change.… https://t.co/HMkzWcrFNy11 days ago
  • ''Building a global portfolio of equities could also provide much needed diversification'', discover why in our Glo… https://t.co/y90GhLlmCD11 days ago
  • What is your stance on executive pay? is bigger really better? Read more in our new ESG feature:… https://t.co/cUXMiCDuE536 days ago
  • November Magazines Cover Story : Interest rates - The slow return to normality . What impact will this have on port… https://t.co/7RYFEXJMVL39 days ago
  • ''Alternative assets have been one of the winners of the banking crisis, which marks its tenth anniversary next yea… https://t.co/pbLbxU9tza39 days ago
  • Pension scheme buy-outs could top £30bn this year - @JLT_EB https://t.co/JhiPizcTnc #pensions52 days ago
  • @PensionsInfra to spend £400m on interests in 10 PPP infrastructure projects https://t.co/O2Lfmy16B6 #infrastructure #pensions87 days ago
  • FirstGroup consolidates £700m of pension assets within the LGPS to create £1bn fund - https://t.co/tOmO0W84h588 days ago
  • £10bn wiped off #FTSE350 DB schemes in October - @JLT_EB https://t.co/iTO0fE005i #pensions113 days ago
  • Capita Asset Services upgrades its UK dividend forecast for 2017 to a record £94bn - https://t.co/9rBSfa16fz #dividends122 days ago
  • Smiths Group shifts £207m of liabilities to Canada Life https://t.co/bJvq65vuB2 #pensions123 days ago
  • A special feature from our sponsor SYZ Asset Management – ‘Contrarian investing in the Italian banking crisis’ https://t.co/6tOeW272XB144 days ago

Interviews

The master planner: David Snowdon

The master planner: David Snowdon

Mark Dunne
Tuesday 17th October 2017

Auto-enrolment, freedom and choice and tightening regulation have helped make it an eventful few years for master trusts.  Mark Dunne spoke to David Snowdon about the £450m SEI Master Trust in its 10th anniversary year and finds out why he believes the UK is set to have fewer master trusts.

"If you are an employee benefit consultancy or a life company and you do not have a history of running trust-based arrangements then you probably have some challenges ahead."

David Snowdon, SEI Master Trust

How have the first 10 years been for SEI Master Trust?

Quite interesting. Since 2007 we have seen a movement towards contract-based schemes and then a movement to where we are today. It is now widely recognised that if you are running a workplace pension scheme that a master trust is the main solution. Within the UK DC we had £450m under management at the end of Q2 for 25 participating employers and about 17,000 members.

What impact has auto-enrolment had on the pensions industry?

We set up the master trust to bring the best of what we do at SEI into the defined contribution (DC) arena. When you look at the uptake of master trusts, which was very much driven within the auto-enrolment arena, you had what was finally known as NEST come out of that master trust structure.

So going from this position where we were one of a few operating a master trust in the UK, after NEST there was a big surge of auto-enrolment vehicles being created by people who could see that there was potentially an opportunity for that mass market, off-the-shelf type of product. It depends on where you get the numbers from and how they are broken down, but if there are 70 master trusts out there, about half of those are auto-enrolment vehicles. From our perspective the uptake of auto-enrolment was positive. For one, a number of our schemes use auto-enrolment because it is their main scheme. They automatically enrol because that is what they have to do.

What it has been quite helpful for is that it made an awful lot of noise about master trusts, especially to the benefit consultants that hadn’t considered this as a vehicle for their clients before, let alone as a potential source of revenue for themselves. They started looking at it and said: “There is a bigger market here than we have been looking at.” To a certain extent, at some point along the way, probably around 2012 or 2013, the penny dropped in that we were moving to a contract base because they seemed a good idea.

We could pass the responsibility, and in some cases the cost, onto the member, and that was the route that was taken. If you want to pass the responsibility away from the employer that is fine, but it is far better to pass it to someone who has oversight. So we have seen a trend of moving away, particularly by the larger schemes that have clearly been looking for an alternative to running their own single trust schemes because of increasing regulation. They obviously realised that there is a better solution out there. The feedback we get from clients is that we are able to create the scheme that they would run if they had the resources, the time and perhaps the advantage of the intellectual capital that we have.

So regulation has been good for you?

You have got to remember that at the time automatic-enrolment came in there was deliberate light touch regulation. Part of that was because of a fear of a capacity crunch. The government said everyone who employs more than a person is going to have to go through automatic-enrolment and there was a fear of NEST not being able to cope.  So we have seen a massive increase in master trusts. There are a lot out there that we may not have heard about a number of years ago, and possibly may not hear of them a few years hence. That increase was effectively facilitated by light-touch regulation. It served a purpose in that we are now getting towards the end of the automatic enrolment process and most employers have gone through okay. So the capacity crunch did not hit. There has been an increased focus on regulation. The Pension Schemes Act 2017 is already in place, setting an authorisation regime for all master trusts which is going to kick in next year. There are requirements on the fitness of trustees. Again, if you have been running a trustee board for 10 years then you can imagine that we are quite well prepared for that. If you are an employee benefit consultancy or a life company and you do not have a history of running trust based arrangements then you probably have some challenges ahead. There are a lot of people in the industry at the moment who are probably wondering if the numbers are going to add up and if it makes sense to continue. I suspect that in October next year, when authorisation kicks in, we will not have 70 master trusts. The year after that we will probably see a reducing number, so regulation is driving change.

What impact has the charge cap made?

It has not made any difference. What I would say is that within the markets we operate in, a larger scheme would not expect a charge to be above 75 basis points for a default strategy. There is a consultation going on at the moment to see if that should fall further. If it does, and clearly there is a move towards scale generally within the master trust environment, then there might be some challenges there. I’m in two minds about reducing this further. Clearly there needs to be control over charges to make sure that members are getting value for money, but there is always the concern over the extent to which you will limit investment creativity. When we started the master trust we wanted to take our best ideas from defined benefit (DB) and fiduciary management and bring them into the DC arena. We worked on a blank canvass. We worked from the perspective of if you have no restrictions what would you do? How would you do it? The more restrictions put in place, this drive to the bottom and focus purely on price, can be counter-productive. That said, it depends on what happens and where it ends up.

Page: 1 2 3
0

Leave your comment

View our comments policy

Please login or register with us to leave a comment. It's completely free!