We use cookies to support features like login and allow trusted media partners to analyse aggregated site usage.
To dismiss this message and allow cookies to be used, please click "Continue".



Twitter board

Follow us
  • Plane thinking: Should trustees take a leaf out of the aviation industry’s book to help avoid schemes joining the P… https://t.co/JVoRimIocM5 days ago
  • Portfolio Prepared? We are hosting an exclusive, pension fund only afternoon 4th July 2018 with @AonRetirementUK .… https://t.co/utQf7b8DYv5 days ago
  • Our Cover Story: ESG: A Just reward - With research claiming that better behaved companies make superior investmen… https://t.co/7VqbSkuEvz16 days ago
  • Our March/April issue is available to view now! https://t.co/d4iYIbsnjH https://t.co/EFO6RlYgkB16 days ago
  • Picking a winner - The multi-asset success story has led to the birth of an array of funds under the same all-encom… https://t.co/kTmIsg9DQS27 days ago
  • @NewtonIM – Renewables Revolution ''In this Newton white paper, we discuss the ability of renewables to deliver wha… https://t.co/NtUk6OB6v427 days ago
  • RT @portfolio_inst: @NewtonIM - ESG Investing: Buzzwords or Better Investment? ''is responsible investment simply a passing trend or a mean…30 days ago
  • @NewtonIM - ESG Investing: Buzzwords or Better Investment? ''is responsible investment simply a passing trend or a… https://t.co/K299tUsPOy30 days ago
  • Fools Gold - Bitcoin: An investor’s new friend or a threat to financial stability? Lynn Strongin Dodds takes a look… https://t.co/VKenEj6LQ730 days ago
  • @NewtonIM Sustainable Bond Investing Newton’s Scott Freedman and Victoria Barron review some of the developments in… https://t.co/6woi4Dfqjc34 days ago
  • RT @portfolio_inst: @InvescoUKinsti whitepaper: Sustainable factor investing ''The advent of what might be called sustainable factor invest…36 days ago
  • @InvescoUKinsti whitepaper: Sustainable factor investing ''The advent of what might be called sustainable factor in… https://t.co/rPdm94o9yU36 days ago
  • Old Money: Forget millennial's, pension funds looking for growth should be targeting cash-rich retirees.… https://t.co/TfPklO4QPr36 days ago
  • RT @MSCI_Cudworth: MSCI in the News. EM governance: Breaking through. Michael Cheng discusses the influence of corporate #governance in #…36 days ago
  • Our cover story: CDC: A step into the unknown. Is CDC an unnecessary policy change when effort would be better spen… https://t.co/QGHfTkiPP240 days ago
  • Newton – Trend Setting: The Year Ahead in ESG ''We have seen notable client interest for sustainable products over… https://t.co/OoXVLJ1BMp41 days ago
  • Our Latest ESG feature: EM governance: Breaking through. ''Those calling for better governance in emerging markets… https://t.co/qk0vJpfpJL44 days ago
  • The February Issue is available online now! Our Cover Story - CDC: A Step in the wrong direction. Read more here:… https://t.co/8xwHL9Nd2z44 days ago
  • RT @AonRetirementUK: What do we expect to see in the #ESG market over the next 12 months? Read the results of the @portfolio_inst panel of…44 days ago
  • RT @PensionsSion: What are the pros and cons of building a global #equity portfolio? Find out by reading the @portfolio_inst Global Equitie…50 days ago

On the radar

The DC cost trap

The DC cost trap

Charlotte Moore
Tuesday 3rd April 2018

Could the focus on cost in DC default funds create the next pensions crisis?  Charlotte Moore takes a look.

"Fees are the last thing which should be considered when making a decision about choosing a DC provider."

Maria Nazarova-Doyle, JLT Employee Benefits

The brief return of volatility to financial markets in February underlined the danger of the relentless focus on cost in the defined contribution (DC) world: a market correction could have a significant impact on the value of pension pots and could spark a crisis.

There is a worrying tendency for cost to be used as a proxy for value. This reflects the greater focus on costs across many financial markets and regions, but it is also a direct result of the introduction of the 0.75% management charge cap for default funds designed for auto-enrolled pensions.

The charge cap has been welcomed as a constructive step by the government to prevent scheme members from paying excessive charges.

Mark Fawcett, chief investment officer at government-backed master trust the National Employment Savings Trust (Nest), says: “High charges act as a drag on performance.”

However, the charge cap can also be viewed as an overly simplistic measure which has fostered an invidious attitude to price.

JLT Employee Benefits head of DC investment consulting Maria Nazarova-Doyle says: “Fees are the last thing which should be considered when making a decision about choosing a DC provider.”

The primary focus should be on ensuring the scheme will deliver the best possible retirement outcome for a member, she adds.

State Street Global Advisors head of European DC investment strategy Alistair Byrne agrees: “It’s right to want to keep costs down but it’s not a good idea to drive them to a minimal level.”

It’s in the interest of members to include risk management and diversification in a default fund, he says.

Royal London Asset Management pension investment strategy manager Lorna Blyth adds: “Cost is only one of five or six key metrics which determine whether a member will have a decent retirement income.”

The unintended consequence of introducing a charge cap is that it has encouraged companies and pension providers to focus on cost rather than value. It has encouraged providers to compete on price and price alone.

SEI’s managing director of defined contribution EMEA and Asia, Steve Charlton, says: “Among master trusts, the best way to gain market share in the auto-enrolment market was to compete on price.” Many companies wanted the scheme to be as cheap as possible so it can’t be criticised by the workforce, he adds.

Page: 1 2 3

Leave your comment

View our comments policy

Please login or register with us to leave a comment. It's completely free!

Friday View

Friday View

How investor action helps cut CO2 emissions