We use cookies to support features like login and allow trusted media partners to analyse aggregated site usage.
To dismiss this message and allow cookies to be used, please click "Continue".



Twitter board

Follow us
  • "To get to the heart of some of the issues surrounding responsible investment we brought trustees, fund managers an… https://t.co/ujIdYI4gKI9 hours ago
  • RT @TimGiles90: @TimManuel17 on Trustee awareness of #climatechange ft in @portfolio_inst latest #aonexpertsinthenews https://t.co/WJdMA3MD…yesterday
  • Beyond bonds: How pension schemes are looking to update their LDI strategies https://t.co/qcq3fx3dJJ #ldi… https://t.co/Aj4PVgTz0G2 days ago
  • Friday View: Climate change: a hot topic - TPR prepares for master trust deadline - Prudential and Aviva's de-risk… https://t.co/c8N8HZ62HE6 days ago
  • As offices and workplaces are heating up, so is the debate on climate change: What are trustees doing to protect sa… https://t.co/U77fvAzS199 days ago
  • Friday View: Infrastructure: Land of opportunity  - FTSE 100 schemes are back in black - Brewery hit by TPR fine -… https://t.co/disYRfYaUw13 days ago
  • With 70% of pension schemes planning to allocate to infrastructure - the scramble for assets begins. Our latest cov… https://t.co/aWetZeBhq216 days ago
  • Exclusive: Border to Coast appoints new CIO https://t.co/mipd2Aeyvy #LGPS #pensions #LPGSpooling https://t.co/P0D1EQLvmu20 days ago
  • Friday View: PPF's Ian Scott - Border to Coast goes live - TPR launches master trust consultation - Railpen invests… https://t.co/mSeDHNrEjP20 days ago
  • Local authority pension pool Border to Coast goes live with two equity funds, hires new CIO: https://t.co/4uIWEpuD1C https://t.co/8UP3stSh9o20 days ago
  • Our interview with the PPF's Ian Scott is now live! “The uniqueness of what we do here at the PPF is sometimes over… https://t.co/On1pYg5aXJ22 days ago
  • Latest buy-in means @UK_CAA has de-risked £1.7bn of pension scheme liabilities - https://t.co/eFRK22wyI2 #pensions https://t.co/rrYgf0fQAr24 days ago
  • Friday View: Border to Coast launches UK equity tender - Rentokil Trustee faces fine - Gleeson directors banned - P… https://t.co/wx2SJ0bGfG34 days ago
  • Shareholder engagement: It’s good to talk For responsible investors talk isn’t cheap. Not only does research sugges… https://t.co/imwrezJuKJ34 days ago
  • Friday View: PA's DB scheme signs buy-out deal - PIC invests in Midlands housing association - Newton Video on Emer… https://t.co/GbWDdyENlN41 days ago
  • RT @minerva_ESG: Hey, all #ESG and#corpgov tweeps, lend a hand to @portfolio_inst important opportunity to support investors' understanding…41 days ago
  • We want to know your appetite and understanding for ESG! Please click the link to take our 5 minute survey to tell… https://t.co/SsVgQzEKIc42 days ago
  • RT @AonRetirementUK: Great event, thanks for hosting @portfolio_inst. Inspired location too! https://t.co/we7Ou46ns342 days ago
  • Full house at our Portfolio Prepared event, Oliver Hamilton Illiquids specialist @AonRetirementUK discusses conside… https://t.co/F0qPFPjUSP43 days ago
  • West Midlland Pension Fund’s Jill Davys: “I am reluctant to overpay for assets” Assistant director of investments a… https://t.co/YHtEIU5BSN45 days ago

On the radar

Active share: are you seeing the whole picture?

Active share: are you seeing the whole picture?

By Sebastian Cheek
Wednesday 2nd September 2015

Active share is increasingly being touted as a way of identifying which fund managers provide higher returns. Others, however, warn strong returns can never be attributed to one single factor. Sebastian Cheek reports.

"Active share can only really be considered in the context of other factors. Without the presence of skill, a manager that looks like a lion based on their active share might actually manage like a lamb."

Hermes Investment Management

As investors continue to distinguish what constitutes true alpha, active managers are being scrutinised over their ability to prove added value rather than simply hugging benchmarks.

One such method which has received considerable attention is active share which, at its core, is a percentage measure of how much an equity portfolio differs from its benchmark. Advocates believe a high active share is a sure-fire way to increase risk-adjusted returns. Others, however, warn the measurement is too narrow in its view.

Although active share has become a buzzword of late, the term was first coined in a 2009 research paper entitled: ‘How Active is your Fund Manager?’and written by Martijn Cremers and Antti Petajisto.

The paper found managers with a higher active share tend to be more consistent in generating high returns against the benchmark, which implies that funds with a higher active share have more skilled managers and are more likely to outperform.

Cremers and Petajisto found the best performers, historically, have been diversified stock pickers with high active share and low tracking error, followed by concentrated stock pickers with high active share and high tracking error. The worst performers, meanwhile, have been managers with low active share and high tracking error. They examined 2,650 funds from 1980 to 2003 and found those with an active share of 80% or higher beat their benchmark indexes by 2-2.71% before fees and by 1.49-1.59% after fees.

The data sounds compelling, but a growing number of industry voices believe although active share is a useful tool for indicating how ‘active’ a manager is and weeding out ‘closet indexers’, using it in isolation fails to take into account a manager’s skill and other ingredients for portfolio construction.

There are also some who question the data. Majedie Asset Management chief executive Rob Harris points to the fact most of the analysis to date has been skewed by “survivor bias”.

He explains: “Those funds that have taken bigger positions against the index which have worked well would be included in the data set, but those which have also taken big positions against the index but which have gone wrong, have probably been shut and been excluded from the data.”

Similarly, AQR Capital Management principal Andrea Frazzini says the data does not provide solid evidence of a drastic difference between high active share and low active share fund returns.

Page: 1 2

Leave your comment

View our comments policy

Please login or register with us to leave a comment. It's completely free!