We use cookies to support features like login and allow trusted media partners to analyse aggregated site usage.
To dismiss this message and allow cookies to be used, please click "Continue".

Continue

Features

Twitter board

Follow us
  • Plane thinking: Should trustees take a leaf out of the aviation industry’s book to help avoid schemes joining the P… https://t.co/JVoRimIocM5 days ago
  • Portfolio Prepared? We are hosting an exclusive, pension fund only afternoon 4th July 2018 with @AonRetirementUK .… https://t.co/utQf7b8DYv5 days ago
  • Our Cover Story: ESG: A Just reward - With research claiming that better behaved companies make superior investmen… https://t.co/7VqbSkuEvz16 days ago
  • Our March/April issue is available to view now! https://t.co/d4iYIbsnjH https://t.co/EFO6RlYgkB16 days ago
  • Picking a winner - The multi-asset success story has led to the birth of an array of funds under the same all-encom… https://t.co/kTmIsg9DQS27 days ago
  • @NewtonIM – Renewables Revolution ''In this Newton white paper, we discuss the ability of renewables to deliver wha… https://t.co/NtUk6OB6v427 days ago
  • RT @portfolio_inst: @NewtonIM - ESG Investing: Buzzwords or Better Investment? ''is responsible investment simply a passing trend or a mean…30 days ago
  • @NewtonIM - ESG Investing: Buzzwords or Better Investment? ''is responsible investment simply a passing trend or a… https://t.co/K299tUsPOy30 days ago
  • Fools Gold - Bitcoin: An investor’s new friend or a threat to financial stability? Lynn Strongin Dodds takes a look… https://t.co/VKenEj6LQ730 days ago
  • @NewtonIM Sustainable Bond Investing Newton’s Scott Freedman and Victoria Barron review some of the developments in… https://t.co/6woi4Dfqjc34 days ago
  • RT @portfolio_inst: @InvescoUKinsti whitepaper: Sustainable factor investing ''The advent of what might be called sustainable factor invest…36 days ago
  • @InvescoUKinsti whitepaper: Sustainable factor investing ''The advent of what might be called sustainable factor in… https://t.co/rPdm94o9yU36 days ago
  • Old Money: Forget millennial's, pension funds looking for growth should be targeting cash-rich retirees.… https://t.co/TfPklO4QPr36 days ago
  • RT @MSCI_Cudworth: MSCI in the News. EM governance: Breaking through. Michael Cheng discusses the influence of corporate #governance in #…36 days ago
  • Our cover story: CDC: A step into the unknown. Is CDC an unnecessary policy change when effort would be better spen… https://t.co/QGHfTkiPP240 days ago
  • Newton – Trend Setting: The Year Ahead in ESG ''We have seen notable client interest for sustainable products over… https://t.co/OoXVLJ1BMp41 days ago
  • Our Latest ESG feature: EM governance: Breaking through. ''Those calling for better governance in emerging markets… https://t.co/qk0vJpfpJL44 days ago
  • The February Issue is available online now! Our Cover Story - CDC: A Step in the wrong direction. Read more here:… https://t.co/8xwHL9Nd2z44 days ago
  • RT @AonRetirementUK: What do we expect to see in the #ESG market over the next 12 months? Read the results of the @portfolio_inst panel of…44 days ago
  • RT @PensionsSion: What are the pros and cons of building a global #equity portfolio? Find out by reading the @portfolio_inst Global Equitie…50 days ago

On the radar

A measure of success

A measure of success

By Sebastian Cheek
Tuesday 27th January 2015

The introduction of benchmarks for defined contribution schemes now allows trustees to compare how the market is doing, regardless of scheme-specific objectives. Sebastian Cheek reports.

"Each scheme will have a specific investment objective, but trustees still need to know what the market as a whole is doing."

Henry Cobbe

The use of benchmarks is prolific in the world of defined benefit (DB) investment, but until recently was a rarity among defined contribution (DC) schemes. The introduction of a DC index series by FTSE in October last year however finally gave the industry a barometer against which to judge default fund investment as a whole. The launch was particularly welcome given The Pensions Regulator’s requirement for DC trustees to carry out a strategic review of defaults every three years.

FTSE business development director Jennie Austin explains the index series was launched to offer trustees a performance benchmark that looks at the investment strategy holistically rather than simply the underlying funds in isolation.

“There was no way of evaluating the whole strategy or the combination of the options that have been put together,” she says. “It is a very standard reference benchmark which is something trustees can look at and actually reference their strategy to.”

The series comprises a number of different indices which represent the performance over time of a two-asset portfolio of equities and bonds that, like most glidepaths, moves progressively away from equity towards fixed income. It also has three index groups with different equity allocations at the outset – 100%, 80% and 60% – to reflect different default risk profiles, as well as different target dates – 2005, 2015, 2025 and 2035 – to reflect cohorts of people retiring at different times.

Investment research and advisory firm Elston Consulting designed the series in conjunction with FTSE. Managing director Henry Cobbe explains in DC pensions, each scheme will have a specific investment objective, but trustees still need to know what the market as a whole is doing.

“Comparing against the FTSE 100 is not appropriate because for different cohorts at different stages of the journey their risk exposure is going to be very different,” he says. “So all we are doing is trying to establish that neutral broad market benchmark but in a cohortised format.”

The indices have a two-asset approach to reflect the two polar opposite choices available to members investing in capital markets: the market portfolio which is, broadly speaking, the global equity market to target a benchmark for younger savers; and the risk-free portfolio or index-linked gilts to target a benchmark for income in retirement.

By comparing the default strategy to a neutral benchmark trustees can also see the value added by making changes to their portfolios such as adding alternatives or multi-asset funds. For this reason, as Cobbe says, the index series does not include asset classes outside of equities and bonds because that would deviate away from the indices’ neutral position.

Page: 1 2
0

Leave your comment

View our comments policy

Please login or register with us to leave a comment. It's completely free!

Friday View

Friday View

How investor action helps cut CO2 emissions