Getting the foundations in place

by

3 Mar 2015

Infrastructure remains an attractive asset class for investors, but there is much to consider before jumping in, Pádraig Floyd finds.

Features

Web Share

Infrastructure remains an attractive asset class for investors, but there is much to consider before jumping in, Pádraig Floyd finds.

These funds are not alone – Avon Pension  Fund and Dorset County Pension Fund  have invested £187m and £40m respectively  into IFM Investor’s Global Infrastructure  Fund.

IFM’s head of business development,  Annabel  Wiscarson, says although the  asset  class is really only a little over a decade  old, most funds are actively looking at it or  have plans to do so. But the biggest problem  is always getting access, and this is  why it is no surprise these funds are forming  alliances.

“Australian pension funds have led the way,  but you cannot do it overnight,” says  Wiscarson.  Though there’s no reason  schemes cannot go it alone and some have  been successful here in the UK as well as  Cananda and Australia, it will always come  down to resources.

“To do that you need to find the right team  and invest well, but also manage the assets  for the long term which is where the real  risks lie,” says Wiscarson.

DEBT APPEAL

Infrastructure isn’t all about the equity  deals any more and funds have been tantalised  with the opportunity of accessing  infrastructure  debt. However, while the  yields of debt – and its higher position in  the credit hierarchy – make it more attractive, Wiscarson believes it is no less taxing  to assess.

“While it offers a relative value, finding the  right products can be difficult,” she says.  And there is another layer of governance to  consider, too.

“If a UK scheme is looking at infrastructure  debt to replace an element of their  fixed income, they are likely replacing gilt  exposure. The debt exposure is unlikely to  be UK-only, which may require a foreign  exchange hedge.”

Gershon Cohen, head of infrastructure  funds at Aberdeen Asset Management  agrees that appetite for infrastructure is  increasing,  but it remains an evolving sector and still faces many challenges.

Debt is a case in point. Banks were the  main provider of finance for the bulk of  infrastructure,  says Cohen, but the global  financial crisis and Basel III resulted in  them withdrawing retreating. It was then  that debt funds, asset management groups  and the likes of the European Investment  Bank saw an opportunity to plug the funding  gap and gain access to infrastructure debt.

“However,” says Cohen, “the capacity and  ability to lend for the long term at competitive  margins means the banks have come  back with a vengeance.

“This is a key dynamic and has lots looking at starting up debt funds, meanwhile banks  are flooding the market with competitively-priced debt.”

DECISION TIME

Another perennial problem is the ability to  make decisions in good time to take  advantage  of opportunities. While investors  are seeking long-term inflation-linked cash  flow, it can take some years to allocate in a  meaningful way. This may influence some  to consider existing  – brownfield – assets  over greenfield ones, says Cohen, and that  may not be the best solution.

“While it’s true these brownfield sites may  be good assets, investors should be looking  at other assets to be sure they’re not just  moving with the market. Looking back in  10 years’ time, it may not prove to have  been a bad decision to have bought a  particular  brownfield asset, but it may not  necessarily  have been the right one.”

Comments

More Articles

Subscribe

Subscribe to Our Newsletter and Magazine

Sign up to the portfolio institutional newsletter to receive a weekly update with our latest features, interviews, ESG content, opinion, roundtables and event invites. Institutional investors also qualify for a free-of-charge magazine subscription.

×